Complete list

Ensembles

$ \def\fm {\,{\tt fm}} \def\MeV {\,{\tt MeV}} \def\GeV {\,{\tt GeV}} \def\degC{\,{^\circ{\tt C}}} \def\degK{\,{\tt K}} $

Description	Set of 3 full QCD gauge ensembles with the x-direction elongated.
Owner	Craig Pelissier October, 2011
Location	impact cluster /mnt/data3/craigp/gwu-ensembles/clover-dyn-elong the $16^3\times 32$ configs at /mnt/data3/craigp/nHYP-beta-kappa-study
Volume	\( N_x=24, 30, 48\times 24^2\quad N_t=48 \) and $16^3\times 32$
Parameters	\(\beta = 7.1\quad\kappa=0.1282 \) \( a=0.1255(7) \text{ fm} \quad m_{\pi}=304(2) \text{ MeV}\)
num. configs	300 per ensemble, 5 trajecs between configs. for $16^3\times32$ we have 149. all these configs are thermalized.
Action	clover-nhyp-smeared $\alpha_0=0.75\;\alpha_1=0.6\;\alpha_2=0.3\; u_0 = 0.868$
Original Project	$\rho$-meson decon on asymmetrical boxes

Description	Set of 3 full QCD gauge ensembles with the x-direction elongated.
Owner	Craig, Kevin, Mike and Dehua
Location	impact cluster /mnt/data3/craigp/nHYP-beta-kappa-study
Volume	\( N_x=24, 28, 32\times 24^2\quad N_t=64 \) and $16^3\times32$
Parameters	\(\beta = 7.1\quad\kappa=0.12838 \) \( a=0.1255(7) \text{ fm} \quad m_{\pi}=220(2) \text{ MeV}\)
num. configs	745 (24), 800(28), 693(32) with 5 trajecs between configs. for $16^3\times32$ we have 320. these configs are not thermalized.
Action	clover-nhyp-smeared $\alpha_0=0.75\;\alpha_1=0.6\;\alpha_2=0.3\; u_0 = 0.868$
Original Project	$\rho$-meson decon on asymmetrical boxes

Be aware that there are some corrupted files. See the email below from Mike:

Subject: Re: bad configs
From: Michael Lujan <mlujan@gwmail.gwu.edu>
To: Andrei Alexandru <aalexan@gwu.edu>
Cc: Dehua Guo <guodehua@gwmail.gwu.edu>

Hi Andrei,

the bad configs we found were for the 48 x 24^2 x 48 ensemble.  These
configurations 119-149 had very different plaquette values than the rest of
the ensemble. As such, I exclude them in the analysis.

Mike

Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:11:43 +1030
From: Jianbo Zhang <jzhang@physics.adelaide.edu.au>
To: Ivan Horvath <horvath@pa.uky.edu>
Subject: Re: 8^4 configs

Hi Ivan,

   I used the table which Frank. Lee give me,  the table presents the
\beta value and corresponding lattice spacing.    and using string
tension.   You can ask Frank Lee
for details.

  for 8^4  , I use 16 processors ( 2,2,2,2),   \beta = 2.295
  for 12^4, Iuse 27 processors ( 1,3,3,3),    \beta = 2.53
  for 16^4, Iuse  64 processors ( 2,2,4,4) ,   \beta = 2.725
  for 24^4, I use  108 processors ( 2,2,6,6),   \beta = 3.0375
BTW,   12^4 50 configurations have finished and 16^4 now have 20 configs.

Jianbo