Overlap eigensystem tests
From Gw-qcd-wiki
Contents
Eigensystem tests
Boundary conditions: 0 = Dirichlet, 1 = Periodic, -1 = Antiperiodic
243 × 64 dynamical configuration, \(a = 0.114 {\rm fm}\)
Configuration: rbc_conf_2464_m0.005_0.04_002055_hyp (Domain Wall Action)
Number of Cores: 1024
B.C. (x y z t) | 1 1 1 0 | 0 1 1 0 |
---|---|---|
Hw Eigenvectors # | 300 | 300 |
Polynomial Order (10-9 error) | 226 | 463 |
Dov Eigenvectors(pair) # | 100 | 100 |
Dov Precision | 10-7 | 10-7 |
# Zero Modes | 2 | 3 |
# Overlap Iterations | 6250 | 5950 |
323 × 64 dynamical configuration, \(a = 0.085 {\rm fm}\)
Configuration: rbc_conf_3264_m0.004_0.03_002190_hyp (Domain Wall Action)
Number of Cores: 2048
B.C. (x y z t) | 1 1 1 0 | 1 1 1 -1 |
---|---|---|
Hw Eigenvectors # | 300 | 200 |
Polynomial Order (10-9 error) | 284 | 118 |
Dov Eigenvectors(pair) # | 100 | 400 |
Dov Precision | 10-7 | 10-9 |
# Zero Modes | 7 | 6 |
# Overlap Iterations | 8500 | 14200 |
323 × 64 dynamical configuration (new), \(a = ?{\rm fm}\)
Configuration: rbc_conf_3264_m0.004_0.03_test_hyp (Domain Wall Action)
Number of Cores: 8192 (But one should resort to only 4096 due to scaling)
B.C. (x y z t) | 1 1 1 0 | 1 1 1 -1 |
---|---|---|
Hw Eigenvectors # | 400 | 400 |
Polynomial Order (10-9 error) | 395 | 215 |
Dov Eigenvectors(pair) # | 100 | 100 |
Dov Precision | 10-7 | 10-7 |
# Zero Modes | Not Known | 15 |
# Overlap Iterations | Did not converge in 24hrs | 34900 |
283 × 56 pure gauge configuration, \(a = 0.15 {\rm fm}\)
Configuration: g282856iw_beta2.34607_194 (Iwasaki Action)
Number of Cores: 1792
# nyhp smears | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
B.C. (x y z t) | 1 1 1 0 | 1 1 1 0 | 1 1 1 0 |
Hw Eigenvectors # | 270 | 270 | 270 |
Polynomial Order (10-9 error) | 379 | 297 | 256 |
Dov Eigenvectors(pair) # | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Dov Precision | 10-7 | 10-7 | 10-7 |
# Zero Modes | 10 | 9 | 14 |
# Overlap Iterations | 26158* | 21700 | 24250 |
323×64 DSDR configuration comparison of 4 and 1 time p-HYP smearing kappa = 0.2, (Test on Hopper)
eigensystem
4 smearings on 1024 cores | 1 smearing on 4096 cores | 2 smearing on 4096 cores | |
---|---|---|---|
# of Hw eigenvectors | 100 | 350 | 350 |
largest Hw eigenvalue computed | 0.2217 | 0.1106 | 0.2012 |
Hw timings | 572 sec | 616 sec | 547 sec |
polynomial order for 10-10 error | 126 | 251 | 139 |
# of Dov eigenvectors 10-8 error | 613 (pair) | 613 (pair) | 613 (pair) |
Chebyshev order/cut | 12/0.01 | 12/0.01 | 12/0.01 |
# Arnoldi iterations | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Timings for overlap convergence | 12.4 hours | 7.2 hours | 4.2 hours |
Topological charge | 17.00 | 14.52 | 15.82 |
# of zero modes | 17 | 15 | 15 |
largest eigenvalue of Dov | +9.09095117521e-03 +1.64894536348e-0 | 6.2930786766e-03 +i 1.3725754329e-01 | 7.0716480399e-03 +i 1.4548173739e-01 |
323×64 DSDR configuration comparison of 1, 2, and 4 time p-HYP smearing kappa = 0.2, (Test on Hopper)
propagator inversions
4 smearings on 1024 cores | 1 smearing on 1024 cores | 2 smearing on 1024 cores | |
---|---|---|---|
# of Hw eigenvectors | 100 | 350 | 350 |
largest Hw eigenvalue computed | 0.2217 | 0.1106 | 0.2012 |
Hw timings | 572 sec | 616 sec | 547 sec |
polynomial order for 10-10 error | 126 | 251 | 139 |
# of Dov eigenvectors 10-8 error | 613 (pair) | 613 (pair) | 613 (pair) |
convergence criteria | 10-8 | 10-8 | 10-8 |
avg # of iterations per inversion | 163 | -- | -- |
total inversions time | 0.54 hours | -- | -- |
(* Locking was on during this run, which might have affected the number of iterations. Locking was off for all other runs) --