Self-duality and local chirality as a function of temperature
Plan
We will generate a set of ensembles with lattices of size $$20^3\times N_t$$, where $$N_t=4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 20$$ and lattice spacing $$a=0.085\,{\rm fm}$$. These will correspond to temperatures of $$579$$, $$386$$, $$331$$, $$290$$, $$258$$, $$232$$, $$193$$, and $$116\,{\rm MeV}$$. We will then scan the temperature going from the confined to the de-confined phase, the transition for pure-glue theory being expected at $$T_c\approx 277\,{\rm MeV}$$ (to get this result we used $$T_c/\sqrt{\sigma}=0.631(2)$$, from hep-lat/9706006 where $$\sigma=(440\,{\rm MeV})^2$$ is the string tension).
Ensemble | Size | T[MeV] | $$N_\text{config}$$ | $$\Lambda_\text{low}^\text{ave}$$ for $$p=1$$ | $$\Lambda_\text{high}^\text{ave}$$ for $$p=1$$ | $$\Lambda_\text{low}^\text{ave}$$ for $$p=2$$ | $$\Lambda_\text{high}^\text{ave}$$ for $$p=2$$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZ1 | $$16^4$$ | 145 | 101 | 87 | 1889 | 137 | 1887 |
AZ2 | $$20^4$$ | 116 | 101 | 37 | 1423 | 58 | 1421 |
AZ3 | $$24^4$$ | 97 | 101 | 17 | 1100 | 28 | 1097 |
AZ4 | $$32^4$$ | 72 | 101 | 8 | 673 | 11 | 670 |
AT1 | $$20^3\times 12$$ | 193 | 201 | 58 | 1680 | 91 | 1678 |
AT2 | $$20^3\times 10$$ | 232 | 201 | 68 | 1778 | 109 | 1776 |
AT3 | $$20^3\times 9$$ | 258 | 201 | 71 | 1836 | 116 | 1834 |
AT4 | $$20^3\times 8$$ | 290 | 401 | 94 | 1903 | 151 | 1901 |
AT5 | $$20^3\times 7$$ | 331 | 401 | 518 | 2002 | 630 | 2000 |
AT6 | $$20^3\times 6$$ | 386 | 101 | 904 | 2143 | 956 | 2141 |
AT7 | $$20^3\times 4$$ | 579 | 101 | 1800 | 2697 | 1838 | 2694 |
To generate these lattices we use Wilson gauge action with $$\beta=6.054$$. We determined this coupling using a non-perturbative parametrization for lattice spacing (see Lattice spacing). We used heat-bath with over-relaxation; at each step we did 5 heat-bath hits and 9 over-relaxation updates. We thermalized the configuration for 2000 steps and save a lattice every 200 steps. We generated 100 configs for each ensemble.
Update: The temperature scale used above, based on the string tension, is not very accurate. In our paper we used $$r_0 T_c= 0.7498(50)$$ value determined by Silvia Necco to set the scale. A more recent determination of the critical coupling $$\beta_c$$ as a function of the temporal lattice size was carried out by Mikko Laine and collaborators. For $$N_t=8$$ the determine $$\beta_c=6.06239(38)$$.